Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml
Date
Msg-id 20220803105315.cha5qmfvbe6zsd6l@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Aug-03, Amit Kapila wrote:

> Thanks for the report and Thanks Michael for including me. I am just
> redirecting it to -hackers so that others involved in this feature
> also can share their views.

I'm sorry, but our policy is that crossposts are not allowed.  I think
this policy is bad, precisely because it prevents legitimate cases like
this one; but it is what it is.

I think we should change the policy, not back to allow indiscriminate
cross-posting, but to allow some limited form of it.  For example I
think pg-bugs+pg-hackers and pg-docs+pg-hackers should be allowed
combinations.  Just saying.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Koterov
Date:
Subject: Re: Does having pg_last_wal_replay_lsn[replica] >= pg_current_wal_insert_lsn[master] guarantee that the replica is caught up?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgresql.conf.sample comment alignment.