On 2022-Jul-29, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:27:01 +1200, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote in
> > Maybe it just needs a replication slot? I see:
> >
> > ERROR: requested WAL segment 000000010000000000000003 has already been removed
>
> Agreed, I see the same. The same failure can be surely reproducible
> by inserting wal-switch+checkpoint after taking backup [1]. And it is
> fixed by the attached.
WFM, pushed that way. I added a slot drop after the pg_stat_replication
count check to be a little less intrusive. Thanks Matthias for
reporting. (Note that the Cirrus page has a download link for the
complete logs as artifacts).
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I'm always right, but sometimes I'm more right than other times."
(Linus Torvalds)
