At Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:48:14 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> Ah, sorry for posting following too-early messages in the thread.
>
> At Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:40:12 -0400, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote in
> > Your system seems to be doing recovery pretty quickly. I wonder if
> > there is a race condition in WAL recycling?
>
> Please take a look on [1]
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220725.171132.2272594383346737093.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
And it has been fixed by cc2c7d65fc in PG15. That discussion [1]
concluded that we don't back-patch it.
regards.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20210202151416.GB3304930%40rfd.leadboat.com
> Does anyone prefer some alternative? It's probably not worth
> back-patching anything for a restartpoint failure this rare, because
> most restartpoint outcomes are not user-visible.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
