Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date
Msg-id 20220721171235.7okm3q5i7jyuwtqw@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Jul-21, Amit Langote wrote:

> Because I wrote all of it while not really understanding how the LLVM
> constructs like blocks and branches work, the only reason I think
> those llvm_compile_expr() additions may be correct is that all the
> tests in jsonb_sqljson.sql pass even if I add the following line at
> the top:

I suggest to build with --enable-coverage, then run the regression tests
and do "make coverage-html" and see if your code appears covered in the
report.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"¿Cómo puedes confiar en algo que pagas y que no ves,
y no confiar en algo que te dan y te lo muestran?" (Germán Poo)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: let's disallow ALTER ROLE bootstrap_superuser NOSUPERUSER
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: let's disallow ALTER ROLE bootstrap_superuser NOSUPERUSER