On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 09:10:52AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I suggest that if log_startup_progress_interval doesn't meet your
> needs here, we should try to understand why not and maybe enhance it,
> instead of adding a separate facility.
+1. AFAICT it should be possible to make the log_startup_progress_interval
machinery extensible enough to be reused for several other tasks that can
take a while but have little visibility.
Since this thread has been inactive for over 2 months, I'm marking the
commitfest entry as Waiting on Author.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
