Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date
Msg-id 20220715210725.7bjweuglzssd775h@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-07-08 17:05:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-07-05 Tu 15:04, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > On 2022-07-05 Tu 14:36, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I think Andrew's beta 2 comment was more about my other architectural
> >>>> complains around the json expression eval stuff.
> >>> Right. That's being worked on but it's not going to be a mechanical fix.
> >> Any updates here?
> >
> > Not yet. A colleague and I are working on it. I'll post a status this
> > week if we can't post a fix.

> We're still working on it. We've made substantial progress but there are
> some tests failing that we need to fix.

I think we need to resolve this soon - or consider the alternatives. A lot of
the new json stuff doesn't seem fully baked, so I'm starting to wonder if we
have to consider pushing it a release further down.

Perhaps you could post your current state? I might be able to help resolving
some of the problems.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures