Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?
Date
Msg-id 20220702014553.GB2301877@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Time to remove unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:13:16PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:05:55PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-07-01 14:56:42 -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >> The unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM has been marked deprecated since v9.1
> >> (ad44d50).  Should it be removed in v16?  If not, should we start emitting
> >> WARNINGs when it is used?
> > 
> > What would we gain? ISTM that the number of scripts and typing habits that'd
> > be broken would vastly exceed the benefit.
> 
> Beyond removing a few lines from gram.y and vacuum.sgml, probably not much.
> If it isn't going to be removed, IMO we should consider removing the
> deprecation notice in the docs.

Deprecation doesn't imply eventual removal.  java.io.StringBufferInputStream
has been deprecated for 25 years.  One should not expect it or the old VACUUM
syntax to go away.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade