Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?
Date
Msg-id 20220614.095252.1151623170938487277.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
At Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:48:26 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> At Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:25:01 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in 
> > +1, but I'm inclined to make it read "... is too long".
> 
> Yeah, I feel so and it is what I wondered about recently when I saw
> some complete error messages.  Is that because of the length of the
> subject?

And I found that it is alrady done. Thanks!

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: "buffer too small" or "path too long"?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation version tracking for macOS