Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
Date
Msg-id 20220506172850.kpq7etekxnyozwnb@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-05-06 12:12:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I looked through all the failures I found and it's two kinds of failures, both
> > related to the deadlock test. So I'm thinking of skipping just that test as in
> > the attached.
> 
> > Working on committing / backpatching that, unless somebody suggests changes
> > quickly...
> 
> WFM.

Done. Perhaps you could trigger a run on longfin, that seems to have been the
most reliably failing animal?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: configure openldap crash warning