Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug
Date
Msg-id 20220420024903.j25vrhfqtfi6zkzt@jrouhaud
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:47:07AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> 
> AFAICT the problem is that SET / RESET part is messing with the HeapTuple, so
> you can't use the procForm reference afterwards.  Simply processing
> parallel_item before set_items fixes the problem, as in the attached.

This time with the file.

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug