Hi,
On 2022-04-16 14:42:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the meantime, since it's clear that HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot
> is failing to meet its contract, I'm going to go fix it.
+1
> I think (based on the above argument) that what it intends to enforce
> is not really the system design we need, but it certainly isn't
> helping anyone that it enforces that design incorrectly.
I think it's approximately right for the current caller. But that caller
likely needs an improved design around snapshots...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
