Re: remove more archiving overhead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: remove more archiving overhead
Date
Msg-id 20220407222327.GA1363808@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remove more archiving overhead  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: remove more archiving overhead  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: remove more archiving overhead  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 09:55:53AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Yes.  I found that a crash at an unfortunate moment can produce multiple
> links to the same file in pg_wal, which seemed bad independent of archival.
> By fixing that (i.e., switching from durable_rename_excl() to
> durable_rename()), we not only avoid this problem, but we also avoid trying
> to archive a file the server is concurrently writing.  Then, after a crash,
> the WAL file to archive should either not exist (which is handled by the
> archiver) or contain the same contents as any preexisting archives.

I moved the fix for this to a new thread [0] since I think it should be
back-patched.  I've attached a new patch that only contains the part
related to reducing archiving overhead.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220407182954.GA1231544%40nathanxps13

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: trigger example for plsample