Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)
Date
Msg-id 20220328.100105.1221496055249686192.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:26:05 +0100, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote in 
> On 2022-Mar-21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > I had a look at this latest version of the patch, and found some things
> > to tweak.  Attached is v21 with three main changes from Kyotaro's v20:
> 
> Pushed this, backpatching to 14 and 13.  It would have been good to
> backpatch further, but there's an (textually trivial) merge conflict
> related to commit e6d8069522c8.  Because that commit conceptually
> touches the same area that this bugfix is about, I'm not sure that
> backpatching further without a lot more thought is wise -- particularly
> so when there's no way to automate the test in branches older than
> master.

Thaks for committing.

> This is quite annoying, considering that the bug was reported shortly
> before 12 went into beta.

Sure.  I'm going to look into that.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: functions