Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements
Date
Msg-id 20220322190406.7hpvvbhtk2curnvt@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements  (David Christensen <david@pgguru.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-03-22 13:15:34 -0500, David Christensen wrote:
> > On Mar 21, 2022, at 7:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > If we'd done it like this from the beginning, it'd have been
> > great, but retrofitting it now is a lot less appealing.
>
> Yeah, agreed on this. As far as I’m concerned we can reject.

Updated CF entry to say so...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: LockAcquireExtended() dontWait vs weaker lock levels than already held
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: LockAcquireExtended() dontWait vs weaker lock levels than already held