On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 01:12:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:
> > we can rely on %lld/%llu and we decided to use them in translatable strings.
>
> Seems like good cleanup, so pushed. I think though that project style
> is to use "long long" or "unsigned long long", without the unnecessary
> "int" --- it certainly makes little sense to do it both ways in the
> same patch.
This seemed familiar - it's about the same thing I sent here, while fixing
ftello().
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20210104025321.GA9712@telsasoft.com
0002-Fix-broken-error-message-on-unseekable-input.patch
--
Justin
