Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
Date
Msg-id 20220314.173410.894041983074364675.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:12:48 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> Then, I tried the same with the patch, and I am surprized to see that
> the rise of the number of newly allocated elements didn't stop and
> went up to 511 elements after the 100 seconds run.  So I found that my
> concern was valid.

Which means my last decision was wrong with high odds..

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: On login trigger: take three