On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:23:51PM -0500, Chapman Flack wrote:
> I did not notice this earlier (sorry), but there seems to remain in
> backup.sgml a programlisting example that shows a psql invocation
> for pg_backup_start, then a tar command, then another psql invocation
> for pg_backup_stop.
>
> I think that was only workable for the exclusive mode, and now it is
> necessary to issue pg_backup_start and pg_backup_stop in the same session.
>
> (The 'touch backup_in_progress' business seems a bit bogus now too,
> suggesting an exclusivity remembered from bygone days.)
>
> I am not sure what a workable, simple example ought to look like.
> Maybe a single psql script issuing the pg_backup_start and the
> pg_backup_stop, with a tar command in between with \! ?
>
> Several bricks shy of production-ready, but it would give the idea.
Another option might be to just remove this section. The top of the
section mentions that this is easily done using pg_basebackup with the -X
parameter. The bottom part of the section includes more complicated steps
for when "more flexibility in copying the backup files is needed..."
AFAICT the more complicated strategy was around before pg_basebackup, and
the pg_basebackup recommendation was added in 2012 as part of 920febd.
Thoughts?
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
