Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date
Msg-id 20220303022106.4a32zuzgnuisd42e@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-02-25 11:32:24 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-25 16:25:01 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022, at 11:52 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 01:32, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was looking the shared memory stats patch again.
> > > 
> > > Can you point me to this thread? I looked for it but couldn't find it.
> 
> > https://postgr.es/m/20180629.173418.190173462.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
> 
> I'll post a rebased version as soon as this is resolved... I have a local one,
> but it just works by nuking a bunch of tests / #ifdefing out code related to
> this.

Now that the pg_stat_subscription_workers changes have been committed, I've
posted a rebased version to the above thread.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats