Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Date
Msg-id 20220226015229.c4ofvhbsd3ej6weo@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-02-25 09:56:47 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-24 08:46:23 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'm mildly inclined to only do 0001 and 0002 for now. We'd not loose msvc
> > coverage, because it already doesn't build the test. Once we've ironed that
> > stuff out, we could do 0003?
> 
> From what I can see in the buildfarm client, we'd not loose (nor gain) any
> buildfarm coverage either. It doesn't run the test today.

Attached are rebased patches. I polished 0001, the regress.pl -> 001_uri.pl
conversion some more (although some of perltidy's changes aren't clearly an
improvement).

I'd like to commit 0001 and 0002 soon, unless somebody sees a reason not to?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: set TESTDIR from perl rather than Makefile
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations