Hi,
On 2022-02-12 20:06:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I think the remaining question here is whether, and if so when,
> to back-patch faa189c93. I'm not sure that the benefit is worth
> the risk of new problems (though maybe I'm just feeling particularly
> pessimistic because of the regressions we've found in this week's
> releases). Leaving aside the behavior of the ssl tests, which
> few people would run anyway, it seems like the benefit is just
> to replace a not-very-helpful error message with a more-helpful
> one. That's worth something, but how much?
Yea, not sure either. Maybe slightly leaning towards not backpatching for now?
If people complain and we've gained a bit more confidence, we can still do so?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
