On 2022-Jan-24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> +decinteger {decdigit}(_?{decdigit})*
> +hexinteger 0[xX](_?{hexdigit})+
> +octinteger 0[oO](_?{octdigit})+
> +bininteger 0[bB](_?{bindigit})+
I think there should be test cases for literals that these seemingly
strange expressions reject, which are a number with trailing _ (0x123_),
and one with consecutive underscores __ (0x12__34).
I like the idea of these literals. I would have found them useful on
many occassions.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
