Hi,
On 2022-01-10 01:14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Fun! That seems to me to be a strong argument for not letting
> the behavior vary depending on isatty().
Yea.
> I think I'd vote for just nuking that output altogether.
> It seems of very dubious value.
It seems worthwhile in some form - on large cluster in copy mode, the "Copying
user relation files" step can take *quite* a while, and even link/clone mode
aren't fast. But perhaps what'd be really needed is something counting up
actual progress in percentage of files and/or space...
I think just coupling it to verbose mode makes the most sense, for now?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
