Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> So, do we want this patch?
>> I think we don't really have a lot of choice. I propose applying this
>> as far back as 9.6 --- anyone think differently?
> +1. If applies to 9.5 and 9.4 without a lot of work, I think we
> should apply it there as well, in case there is out-of-core use of DSM
> (or, in 9.5, also of ParallelContext).
I'll take a look, but I doubt it's worth much extra effort (and you
seem to agree).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
