Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Date
Msg-id 20211217124637.GF17618@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: In-placre persistance change of a relation  (Jakub Wartak <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>)
Responses RE: In-placre persistance change of a relation  (Jakub Wartak <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:10:30AM +0000, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> I'm especially worried if I didn't screw up something/forgot something related to the last one (rd->rd_smgr changes),
butI'm getting "All 210 tests passed".
 

> As the thread didn't get a lot of traction, I've registered it into current commitfest
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3461/with You as the author and in 'Ready for review' state. 
 
> I think it behaves as almost finished one and apparently after reading all those discussions that go back over
10years+time span about this feature, and lot of failed effort towards wal_level=noWAL I think it would be nice to
finallystart getting some of that of it into the core.
 

The patch is failing:
http://cfbot.cputube.org/kyotaro-horiguchi.html

https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5564333871595520/regress_diffs/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/regress/regression.diffs

I think you ran "make check", but should run something like this:
make check-world -j8 >check-world.log 2>&1 && echo Success

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rahila Syed
Date:
Subject: Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Next
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to avoid orphaned dependencies