Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 202112162124.m2sgkdxnuuty@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Dec-15, Melanie Plageman wrote:

> I noticed after changing the docs on the "bgwriter" target for
> pg_stat_reset_shared to say "checkpointer", that it still said "bgwriter" in
>   src/backend/po/ko.po
>   src/backend/po/it.po
>   ...
> I presume these are automatically updated with some incantation, but I wasn't
> sure what it was nor could I find documentation on this.

Yes, feel free to ignore those files completely.  They are updated using
an external workflow that you don't need to concern yourself with.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"World domination is proceeding according to plan"        (Andrew Morton)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm support for older versions
Next
From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum