Re: Adding CI to our tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date
Msg-id 20211215144245.GS17618@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding CI to our tree  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Adding CI to our tree  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:45:23PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2021-12-13 18:14:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > > On 2021-12-13 16:02:50 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >> sudo is used exactly twice; maybe it's not needed at all ?
> >
> > > The macos one is needed, but the freebsd one indeed isn't.
> >
> > I'm with Justin on this one.  I would view a script trying to
> > mess with /cores as a hostile act.  PG cores on macOS tend to
> > be extremely large and can fill up your disk fairly quickly
> > if you don't know they're being accumulated.  I think it's okay
> > to suggest in the documentation that people might want to allow
> > cores to be dropped, but the script has NO business trying to
> > force that.
> 
> I'm not quite following. This is a ephemeral CI instance?

As for myself, all I meant is that it's better to write it with zero sudos than
one (for the same reason that it's better to write with one than with two).

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows.
Next
From: Aliaksandr Kalenik
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] sort leaf pages by ctid for gist indexes built using sorted method