Hi,
On 2021-12-13 19:46:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 05:20:52PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > These days isolationtester.c already prefixes log output with the session
> > name. How about doing the same for application_name? It's a *tad* more
> > complicated than I'd like because isolationtester.c currently doesn't know the
> > name of the test its executing.
>
> +1 for the idea. Maybe it could be backpatched?
Not entirely trivially - the changes have some dependencies on other changes
(e.g. b1907d688, more on 741d7f104, but that was backpatched). I guess we
could backpatch b1907d688 as well, but I'm not sure its worth it?
> > + * easier to map spec file sesions to log output and
>
> One s/sesions/sessions/ here.
Ah, good catch.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
