Re: Enforce work_mem per worker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: Enforce work_mem per worker
Date
Msg-id 20211129151059.GM17618@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enforce work_mem per worker  (Arne Roland <A.Roland@index.de>)
Responses Re: Enforce work_mem per worker
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:01:35PM +0000, Arne Roland wrote:
> But my main goal is something else. I can't explain my clients, why a chanced statistics due to autovacuum suddenly
leadsto oom. They would be right to question postgres qualification for any serious production system.
 

What version postgres was that on ?

I realize it doesn't address your question, but since PG13, HashAggregate
respects work_mem.  Depending on the details of the query plan, that's arguably
a bigger problem than the absence of a global work_mem.  At least that one is
resolved.

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Euler Taveira"
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Lots of memory allocated when reassigning Large Objects