Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto
Date
Msg-id 202111221625.ukj6wq4fuavn@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Oct-28, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:

> Thanks all for reviewing this. Here's the CF entry -
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3378/

Thanks, pushed.  I changed a couple of things though -- notably changed
the elog() to ereport() as suggested by Nathan early on, but never
materialized in the submitted patch.  I also changed the wording of the
context names, since the proposed ones weren't much more satisfactory
than the existing ones.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera           39°49'30"S 73°17'W  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough."
https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is a function to a 1-component record type undeclarable?
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: Is a function to a 1-component record type undeclarable?