Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects
Date
Msg-id 20211116204223.2a2qbd3xervd27ve@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2021-11-16 15:19:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Hm. I think this might included a bunch of convoluting factors that make it
> > hard to judge the actual size of the performance difference.
> 
> Yes, I think so, too.

FWIW I ran that pgench thing I presented upthread, and I didn't see any
meaningful and repeatable performance difference 354a1f8d220, ad26ee28250 and
0002 applied ontop of ad26ee28250. The run-to-run variance is way higher than
the difference between the changes.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs