On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 02:54:56PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Sasasu (i@sasa.su) wrote:
> > A unified block-based I/O API sounds great. Has anyone tried to do this
> > before? It would be nice if the front-end tools could also use these API.
>
> The TDE patch from Cybertec did go down this route, but the API ended up
> being rather different which menat a lot of changes in other parts of
> the system. If we can get a block-based temporary file method that
> maintains more-or-less the same API, that'd be great, but I'm not sure
> that we can really do so and I am not entirely convinced that we should
> make the TDE effort depend on an otherwise quite independent effort of
> making all temp files usage be block based.
Uh, I thought people felt the Cybertec patch was too large and that a
unified API for temporary file I/O-encryption was a requirement. Would
a CTR-steaming-encryption API for temporary tables be easier to
implement?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
