Re: storing an explicit nonce - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: storing an explicit nonce
Date
Msg-id 20211011170900.GC643@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:01:08PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > It is more than just the page format --- it would also be the added
> > code, possible performance impact, and later code maintenance to allow
> > for are a more complex or two different page formats.
> 
> Yes, there is more to it than just the page format, I agree.  I'm still
> of the mind that it's something we're going to get to eventually, if for
> no other reason than that our current page format is certainly not
> perfect and it'd be pretty awesome if we could make improvements to it
> (independently of TDE or anything else discussed currently).

Yes, 100% agree on that.  The good part is that TDE would not be paying
the cost for that.  ;-)

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: storing an explicit nonce
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations