Re: Numeric x^y for negative x - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Date
Msg-id 20210930172507.GA10820@ahch-to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numeric x^y for negative x  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Numeric x^y for negative x  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 07:29:13PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 17:51, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >
> > I came here just to opine that there should be a comment about there not
> > being a clamp to the maximum scale.  For example, log_var says "Set the
> > scales .. so that they each have more digits ..." which seems clear
> > enough; I think the new comment is a bit on the short side.
> >
> 
> OK, that's a fair point. Updated version attached.
> 

Hi Dean,

Are you planning to commit this soon?

-- 
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: Document spaces in .pgpass need to be escaped