Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 20210825053219.GA1918372@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:06:54PM -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 08/24/21 16:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> > about adding PGDLLIMPORT, which ought to be totally uncontroversial,
> 
> The thing is, I think I have somewhere a list of all the threads on this
> topic that I've read through since the first time I had to come with my own
> hat in hand asking for a PGDLLIMPORT on something, years ago now, and
> I don't think I have ever seen one where it was as uncontroversial
> as you suggest.

The "ought" above is a load-bearing word.  Nonetheless, here's a case, also
involving GUCs, where it was uncontroversial:
https://postgr.es/m/flat/20171120200230.iwcmptwznbvl6y4c%40alap3.anarazel.de



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE