Re: Commitfest overflow - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Commitfest overflow
Date
Msg-id 20210803185749.GK3639@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest overflow  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Commitfest overflow  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Commitfest overflow  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug  3, 2021 at 08:51:57PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> How would this be different from the CFM just rejecting patches? It does not
> matter if there's an explicit number of patches that we allow to be moved to
> the next CF - someone still needs to make the decision, and I agree with Tom
> it probably should not be CFM's job.

My experience with the query id patch is that it can't be rejected
because everyone wants it, but it needs work to get it in a state that
everyone approves of.  Sometimes it is impossible for the patch author
to figure that out, and I needed Álvaro Herrera's help on the query id
patch, so even I wasn't able to figure it out alone.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest overflow
Next
From: Michail Nikolaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow standby snapshot