On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:12:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Interesting. I see several cases where our docs are not clear we
> > process only the first match:
>
> At least two of these changes are flat out wrong. The places
> that explicitly mention "substring(s)" are not doing so because
> we failed to think about what that meant.
I really don't understand the use of "(s)" except in place where we are
really trying to point out the idea of one or multiple, and I don't see
that being significant in these cases --- can you clarify?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
