Re: storing an explicit nonce - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: storing an explicit nonce
Date
Msg-id 20210715144546.GA14882@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: storing an explicit nonce  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 09:45:12PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 2:52 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:02:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > For these reasons, if we decide to go in the direction of using a
> > > non-LSN nonce, I no longer plan to continue working on this feature. I
> > > would rather work on things that have a more positive impact.  Maybe a
> > > non-LSN nonce is a better long-term plan, but there are too many
> > > unknowns and complexity for me to feel comfortable with it.
> >
> > As stated above, I have no plans to continue working on this feature.  I
> > am attaching my final patches here in case anyone wants to make use of
> > them;  it passes check-world and all my private tests.  I have removed
> > my patches from the feature wiki page:
> >
> >         https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption
> >
> > and replaced it with a link to this email.
> 
> The patch does not apply on Head anymore, could you rebase and post a
> patch. I'm changing the status to "Waiting for Author".

Oh, I forgot this was in the commitfast.  I have marked it as Withdrawn.
Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use optimized single-datum tuplesort in ExecSort
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: What are exactly bootstrap processes, auxiliary processes, standalone backends, normal backends(user sessions)?