Re: Partitioned index can be not dumped - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Partitioned index can be not dumped
Date
Msg-id 202106302132.7nazvrjdsbtp@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned index can be not dumped  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned index can be not dumped  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Jun-30, Zhihong Yu wrote:

> Hi,
> nit:
> -       if (hasindex)
> +       if (nindexes > 0)
> 
> It seems hasindex is no longer needed since nindexes is checked.

It's still used to call vac_update_relstats().  We want nindexes to be 0
for partitioned tables, but still pass true when there are indexes.

Please don't forget to trim the text of the email you're replying to.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                        Valdivia, Chile
                        https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple pg_waldump --rmgr options
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New committers: Daniel Gustafsson and John Naylor