Re: storing an explicit nonce - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:02:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> For these reasons, if we decide to go in the direction of using a
> non-LSN nonce, I no longer plan to continue working on this feature. I
> would rather work on things that have a more positive impact.  Maybe a
> non-LSN nonce is a better long-term plan, but there are too many
> unknowns and complexity for me to feel comfortable with it.

As stated above, I have no plans to continue working on this feature.  I
am attaching my final patches here in case anyone wants to make use of
them;  it passes check-world and all my private tests.  I have removed
my patches from the feature wiki page:

    https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption

and replaced it with a link to this email.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.