Hi,
On 2021-06-15 12:51:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > Oh, maybe I'm the one who misunderstood...
>
> So, it's well over a year later, and so far as I can see exactly
> nothing has been done about snapshot_too_old's problems.
>
> I never liked that feature to begin with, and I would be very
> glad to undertake the task of ripping it out. If someone thinks
> this should not happen, please commit to fixing it ... and not
> "eventually".
I still think that's the most reasonable course. I actually like the
feature, but I don't think a better implementation of it would share
much if any of the current infrastructure.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
