Re: bottom / top posting - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: bottom / top posting
Date
Msg-id 20210608215611.GA26045@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bottom / top posting  (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>)
Responses Re: bottom / top posting
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jun  7, 2021 at 07:53:30PM +0200, Francisco Olarte wrote:
> message like yours in 5-10 seconds, properly scanning a top posted one
> takes much longer. So normally I stop reading at the quote and discard
> the message if I have not understood with what I have read UNLESS it's
> from my mother or I'm been paid to read it.
> 
> I find top-posting moderately offensive, like saying "I am not going
> to waste time to make your reading experience better".

Yes, that is basically it, and if you are only communicating with one
other person, maybe that is reasonable.  However, since our emails are
read by thousands, we have a responsibility to make them as clear as
possible, and that includes trimming and quoting relevant parts of
messages.  However, as much as I try, I still regularly have typos in my
emails.  :-(

And you are right in your earlier email in saying that "don't top-post"
or "bottom-post" is not clear enough in explaining how to properly
"trim-post", as you stated.  Some people trim-post automatically, while
others have never thought about it since their communication is almost
always informal.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: index unique
Next
From: Ignacio Rey
Date:
Subject: JDBC error: Unexpected packet type: 25