Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date
Msg-id 20210603210642.GF22012@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun  3, 2021 at 04:55:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> > It might also put us a hard spot if the next TLS spec ends up being called
> > something other than TLS?  It's clearly happened before =)
> 
> Good point.  I'm inclined to just stick with the SSL terminology.

I wonder if we should use SSL/TLS in more places in our documentation.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add regression test for recovery pause.