Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date
Msg-id 20210518150948.GC30270@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:51:00AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > As things stand, in this case I think it *should* be included, since the
> > backpatched change isn't the same as the change to HEAD (removing the GUC).
> > The git_changelog output might well be wrong in this case (or, arguably, the
> > "remove the GUC entirely" should've been a separate master-only commit than the
> > "make the GUC do nothing" commit).
> 
> I suppose that's true -- maybe it should be listed separately, because
> the GUC is removed in 14 only.

OK, this is a mess then.  Would someone please give me the full text for
this, including the commit hash(es)?  Is the PG 13.3 release note text
accurate?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple pg_waldump --rmgr options