Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20210513033332.GF11075@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:16:13AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:06:52PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:57:00AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > > > > source? What if you have for instance pg_stat_statements, pg_stat_kcache, > > > pg_store_plans and pg_wait_sampling installed? All those extensions need a > > > query_id (or at least benefit from it for pg_wait_sampling), is there any value > > > to give a full list of all the modules that would enable compute_query_id? > > > > Well, we don't have any other cases where the source of the change is > > this indeterminate, so I don't really have a suggestion. I think this > > does highlight another case where 'auto' just isn't a good fit for our > > API. > > It may depends on your next question > > > > I'm assuming that anyone wanting to install any of those extensions (or any > > > similar one) is fully aware that they aggregate metrics based on at least a > > > query_id. If they don't, well they probably never read any documentation since > > > postgres 9.2 which introduced query normalization, and I doubt that they will > > > be interested in having access to the information anyway. > > > > My point is that we are changing a setting from an extension, and if you > > look in pg_setting, it will say "default"? > > No, it will say "on". What the patch I sent implements is: I was asking what pg_settings.source will say: SELECT name, soource FROM pg_settings; > - compute_query_id = on means it was either explicitly set to on, or > automatically set to on if it was allowed to (so initially set to auto). It > means you know whether core query_id calculation is enabled or not, you can > know looking at the reset value it it was changed by an extension, you just > don't know which one(s). > > - compute_query_id = auto means that it can be set to on, it just wasn't yet, > so it's off, and may change if you have an extension that can be dynamically > loaded and request for core query_id calculation to be enabled So, it is 'off', but not set to 'off' in the GUC sense --- just off as in not being computed. You can see the confusion in my just reading that sentence. > - compute_query_id = off means it's off > > > If the user already has to edit postgresql.conf to set > > shared_preload_libraries, I still don't see why having them set > > compute_query_id at the same time is a significant problem and a reason > > to distort our API to do 'auto'. > > Looking at the arguments until now my understanding is that it's because "no > one will read the doc anyway". How do they know to set shared_preload_libraries then? We change the user API all the time, especially in GUCs, and even rename them, but for some reason we don't think people using pg_stat_statements can be trusted to read the release notes and change their behavior. I just don't get it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
pgsql-hackers by date: