Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 20210513033332.GF11075@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
| Responses |
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:16:13AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:06:52PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:57:00AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > > source? What if you have for instance pg_stat_statements, pg_stat_kcache,
> > > pg_store_plans and pg_wait_sampling installed? All those extensions need a
> > > query_id (or at least benefit from it for pg_wait_sampling), is there any value
> > > to give a full list of all the modules that would enable compute_query_id?
> >
> > Well, we don't have any other cases where the source of the change is
> > this indeterminate, so I don't really have a suggestion. I think this
> > does highlight another case where 'auto' just isn't a good fit for our
> > API.
>
> It may depends on your next question
>
> > > I'm assuming that anyone wanting to install any of those extensions (or any
> > > similar one) is fully aware that they aggregate metrics based on at least a
> > > query_id. If they don't, well they probably never read any documentation since
> > > postgres 9.2 which introduced query normalization, and I doubt that they will
> > > be interested in having access to the information anyway.
> >
> > My point is that we are changing a setting from an extension, and if you
> > look in pg_setting, it will say "default"?
>
> No, it will say "on". What the patch I sent implements is:
I was asking what pg_settings.source will say:
SELECT name, soource FROM pg_settings;
> - compute_query_id = on means it was either explicitly set to on, or
> automatically set to on if it was allowed to (so initially set to auto). It
> means you know whether core query_id calculation is enabled or not, you can
> know looking at the reset value it it was changed by an extension, you just
> don't know which one(s).
>
> - compute_query_id = auto means that it can be set to on, it just wasn't yet,
> so it's off, and may change if you have an extension that can be dynamically
> loaded and request for core query_id calculation to be enabled
So, it is 'off', but not set to 'off' in the GUC sense --- just off as
in not being computed. You can see the confusion in my just reading
that sentence.
> - compute_query_id = off means it's off
>
> > If the user already has to edit postgresql.conf to set
> > shared_preload_libraries, I still don't see why having them set
> > compute_query_id at the same time is a significant problem and a reason
> > to distort our API to do 'auto'.
>
> Looking at the arguments until now my understanding is that it's because "no
> one will read the doc anyway".
How do they know to set shared_preload_libraries then? We change the
user API all the time, especially in GUCs, and even rename them, but for
some reason we don't think people using pg_stat_statements can be
trusted to read the release notes and change their behavior. I just
don't get it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
pgsql-hackers by date: