Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id 20210511215616.GA13282@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Apr-23, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:43:46PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > 
> > I think that should probably have been written down somewhere other than for
> > the manual ANALYZE command, but in any case it seems to be outdated now.
> 
> Starting with this 

Agreed, we need some more docs here.  I lightly edited yours and ended
up with this -- mostly I think partitioned tables should not be in the
same paragraph as legacy inheritance because the behavior is different
enough (partitioned tables are not analyzed twice).

I'll give a deeper look tomorrow to see if other places also need edits.

Thanks

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats.