Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup
Date
Msg-id 20210422.132527.374548856273385613.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:06:50 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in 
> Either works for me. I didn't add "()" because I just used the same
> description
> as that in func.sgml.
> 
>         it may be useful to run <function>pg_switch_wal</function> on the
>         primary in order to trigger an immediate segment switch.)
..
> IMO "in order to..." part is helpful for us to understand why
> pg_switch_wal
> is useful in this case. So I'd like to leave it.

Ok, I'm fine with both of them. Thanks for the explanation.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Table refer leak in logical replication