Re: pg_upgrade check for invalid role-specific default config - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade check for invalid role-specific default config
Date
Msg-id 20210412211602.GC22319@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_upgrade check for invalid role-specific default config  (Charlie Hornsby <charlie.hornsby@hotmail.co.uk>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade check for invalid role-specific default config  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:28:19PM +0000, Charlie Hornsby wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> While troubleshooting a failed upgrade from v11 -> v12 I realised I had
> encountered a bug previously reported on the pgsql-bugs mailing list:
> 
> #14242 Role with a setconfig "role" setting to a nonexistent role causes
> pg_upgrade to fail
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160711223641.1426.86096%40wrigleys.postgresql.org

...

> Since it is possible to write a query to identify these cases, would there
> be appetite for me to submit a patch to add a check for this to 
> pg_upgrade?
> 
> First time mailing list user here so many apologies for any missteps I have
> made in this message.

Yes, I think a patch would be good, but the fix might be for pg_dump
instead, which pg_upgrade uses.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing to create LEAKPROOF functions to non-superuser
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade check for invalid role-specific default config