On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 02:28:02AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something query_string isn't a global variable, it's a
> parameter passed to exec_simple_query() from postgresMain().
>
> It's then passed to the stats collector to be able to be displayed in
> pg_stat_activity through pgstat_report_activity() a bit like what I do for the
> queryid.
>
> There's a global variable debug_query_string, but it's only for debugging
> purpose.
>
> > > I wonder if the query hash
> > > should be a global variable too --- this would more clearly match how we
> > > handle top-level info like query_string. Digging into the stats system
> > > to get top-level info does seem odd.
>
> The main difference is that there's a single top level query_string,
> even if it contains multiple statements. But there would be multiple queryid
> calculated in that case and we don't want to change it during a top level
> multi-statements execution, so we can't use the same approach.
>
> Also, the query_string is directly logged from this code path, while the
> queryid is logged as a log_line_prefix, and almost all the code there also
> retrieve information from some shared structure.
>
> And since it also has to be available in pg_stat_activity, having a single
> source of truth looked like a better approach.
>
> > Also, if you go in that direction, make sure the hash it set in the same
> > places the query string is set, though I am unclear how extensions would
> > handle that.
>
> It should be transparent for application, it's extracting the first queryid
> seen for each top level statement and export it. The rest of the code still
> continue to see the queryid that corresponds to the really executed single
> statement.
OK, I am happy with your design decisions, thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
