Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?
Date
Msg-id 20210204.111953.866521874345150145.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?  (torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?
List pgsql-hackers
At Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:16:47 +0900, torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in 
> Chengxi Sun, Yamada-san, Horiguchi-san,
> 
> Thanks for all your comments.
> Adding only the number of generic plan execution seems acceptable.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:10 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Note that ActivePortal is the closest nested portal. So it gives the
> > wrong result for nested portals.
> 
> I may be wrong, but I thought it was ok since the closest nested
> portal is the portal to be executed.

After executing the inner-most portal, is_plan_type_generic has a
value for the inner-most portal and it won't be changed ever after. At
the ExecutorEnd of all the upper-portals see the value for the
inner-most portal left behind is_plan_type_generic nevertheless the
portals at every nest level are indenpendent.

> ActivePortal is used in ExecutorStart hook in the patch.
> And as far as I read PortalStart(), ActivePortal is changed to the
> portal to be executed before ExecutorStart().
> 
> If possible, could you tell me the specific case which causes wrong
> results?

Running a plpgsql function that does PREPRE in a query that does
PREPARE?

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in COPY FROM backslash escaping multi-byte chars
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Recording foreign key relationships for the system catalogs