> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:02:42PM -0500, Dian M Fay wrote:
> > Other than that, since I've already posted the patch for returning an
> > error option, it seems that the only thing left is to decide with which
> > version to go.
>
> The trigger issue (which I did verify) makes the "no update" option
> unworkable imo, JavaScript's behavior notwithstanding. But it should be
> called out very clearly in the documentation, since it does depart from
> what people more familiar with that behavior may expect. Here's a quick
> draft, based on your v44 patch:
>
> <para>
> <type>jsonb</type> data type supports array-style subscripting expressions
> to extract or update particular elements. It's possible to use multiple
> subscripting expressions to extract nested values. In this case, a chain of
> subscripting expressions follows the same rules as the
> <literal>path</literal> argument in <literal>jsonb_set</literal> function,
> e.g. in case of arrays it is a 0-based operation or that negative integers
> that appear in <literal>path</literal> count from the end of JSON arrays.
> The result of subscripting expressions is always of the jsonb data type.
> </para>
> <para>
> <command>UPDATE</command> statements may use subscripting in the
> <literal>SET</literal> clause to modify <type>jsonb</type> values. Every
> affected value must conform to the path defined by the subscript(s). If the
> path cannot be followed to its end for any individual value (e.g.
> <literal>val['a']['b']['c']</literal> where <literal>val['a']</literal> or
> <literal>val['b']</literal> is null, a string, or a number), an error is
> raised even if other values do conform.
> </para>
> <para>
> An example of subscripting syntax:
Yes, makes sense. I've incorporated your suggestion into the last patch,
thanks.
